As I indicated in a blog post last August, Erich Fromm said in 1976 that if humanity is to avoid psychological and economic catastrophe, science needs to break through its Life-denying dogmas to embrace an art and science of humanity, as the basis for social reconstruction. For while Simon Blackburn has edited a series of books on The Big Questions of Philosophy, Physics, The Universe, Mathematics, God, and Evolution, a book on the fundamental questions of what it truly means to be human is conspicuous by its absence.
The principal questions are, of course, Who are we?, Where have we come from?, and Where are we all heading at breakneck speeds? They are encapsulated in the most critical unanswered question in science: What is causing scientists and technologists, aided and abetted by computer technology, to drive the pace of scientific discovery and technological development at unprecedented exponential rates of acceleration?
Answering these questions through self-inquiry is utterly essential at the present time, as 13.8 billion years of bifurcating evolutionary processes have reached their Accumulation Point in the psychosocial chaos reported in the corporate and social media every day.
There is only one solution to this problem: evolution must turn its divergent tendencies into harmonious convergence, thereby healing our fragmented minds and split souls in Wholeness. But as we are all the products of billions of years of evolution, we specialize in various fields in the workplace, including academia, which maintains the splintered conceptual and linguistic framework of our divisive culture, where we are told to fight our fellow human beings for a slice of the finite financial pie.
Our specialisms and relationships with our social milieu thus inhibit our abilities to turn evolutionary divergence into convergence, leading to Peace on Earth. At best, we could intuitively feel into our Divine Essence as humans, helping evolution to become fully aware of itself, as Julian Huxley foresaw in 1957 in an essay titled ‘Transhumanism’, which some technocrats have misinterpreted.
This essentially is what has happened to me since my conception in England at the end of August 1941. So, the creative power of Life, emanating from the Divine Origin of the Universe, is guiding me to describe my Holoramic (Whole-seeing) vision, trusting that this could be of assistance to my fellow human beings, at this most critical point in human history.
In brief, to develop a coherent scientific method to study our evolutionary story – as both a species and my own – I have used the universal system of thought and several psychospiritual techniques to systematically map the nonmaterial patterns lying in the Cosmic Psyche – including the collective unconscious – as I explain in a recent essay titled ‘Unifying All Models of God in Cosmic Gnosis’.
But such a semantic modelling method is more an art than a science, as we can see from the roots of these words. First, science derives from Latin scīre ‘to separate one thing from another; to know, discern’, from Proto-Indo-European (PIE) base *skei– ‘to cut, split’, root of schizoid. So, to heal science of schizophrenia, out of touch with Ultimate Reality, we need to use our artistic abilities to turn analysis into synthesis. For art derives from the PIE base *ar– ‘to fit together’, the root of order and harmony.
One particular weakness of conventional scientific method is that observations that might invalidate a theory appear to do so because the cognitive assumptions on which they are based are false. We can overcome this dilemma by integrating our specialist theories in and on the Cosmic Context and Gnostic Foundation of Wholeness.
This is especially relevant in quantum physics, where the observer and observer are one, as David Bohm noted. So, it is just as important to observe the observer without assumptions as the observed, as his friend and collaborator Jiddu Krishnamurti often taught.
Questioning our assumptions is vital today, for without such curious scepticism, humankind is not a viable species, as Bohm pointed out. For we cannot realize our fullest potential as humans by starting with the cognitive confusion the world is in today. Studying our traditions without critical thinking cannot tell us what it means to be human.
Accordingly, in 1985, Bohm proposed a social process of Dialogue with Donald Factor and Peter Garrett at the Emissaries of Divine Light, which states, “In Dialogue, a group of people can explore the individual and collective presuppositions, ideas, beliefs, and feelings that subtly control their interactions.” Lee Nichol then edited a posthumous summary of Bohm’s thoughts on Dialogue, saying in his foreword, “Such an inquiry necessarily calls into question deeply held assumptions regarding culture, meaning, and identity.”
Many communities around the world are today engaged in questioning our cultural assumptions in various ways. However, they are not generally following the advice of Vimala Thakar, who wisely said in the opening paragraph of Spirituality and Social Action: A Holistic Approach, “In a time when the survival of the human race is in question, continuing with the status quo is to cooperate with insanity, to contribute to chaos.” She therefore asks, “Do we have the vitality to go beyond narrow, one-sided views of human life and to open ourselves to totality, wholeness?” For, as she says, “The call of the hour is to move beyond the fragmentary, to awaken to total revolution.”
For myself, because my 3½-year-old brother was knocked down and killed by an army lorry about seven weeks after my conception, I did not become assimilated into the culture of my parents during infancy and childhood. Consequently, I spent my adolescence questioning all the assumptions of religion, science, economics, mathematics, and logic, as they were taught to me at church, school, and university. Despite being deeply depressed about the world I was living in, I managed to get a degree in mathematics, as the ticket to the world of work, but I have no idea how.
So, when I began to develop the art and science of humanity at the age of 38 – by starting afresh at the very beginning – I had comparatively little to unlearn. Rather, the radiant Light of Consciousness has enabled me to utilize Self-reflective Intelligence to cognitively map the Totality of Existence (TOE) with the Theory of Everything (TOE), which is a coherent, harmonious body of knowledge—ultimately indivisible and ineffable. This I call Panosophy, which Comenius, as the ‘father of modern education’, regarded as ‘Universal Wisdom’.
As a Panosopher, I relate to all humans in particular ways – from the mystical, through the mundane, to the mathematical – but to no one else in Totality. So, living in Wholeness at the Alpha/Omega Point of evolution can be rather lonesome. Nevertheless, I continue to seek a language by which we could share experiences and communicate with each other.
For, when we question all our assumptions, we need to change the meanings of many words. We can do so by studying what Bohm aptly called the ‘archaeology of language’, thereby revealing the true meanings of words. For etymology derives from Greek etumos ‘true, real, actual’. For myself, I have spent many years developing a hyperlinked and indexed Glossary of nearly 500 terms. For instance, in transcultural and transdisciplinary Panosophy, the words God and Universe both denote Ultimate Reality, exquisitely encapsulated in the Sanskrit word Satchitānanda ‘Bliss of Absolute Truth and Cosmic Consciousness’.
However, the website holding the Glossary was hacked to destruction in April 2024. Using my limited abilities, I have been able to partially restore it from backups on a subdomain of this eponymous website. So, if I could find a skilled Drupal web developer to help me, it could be updated and further developed for the enjoyment of many others.
But we have very little time to do so, because humankind is subject to exactly the same laws of the Universe as any other structure. This means that our species is not immortal, destined to survive and thrive for billions or even for thousands more years, as far ahead as the millennia since the first civilizations appeared on Earth. One day, a generation of children will be born who will not have children of their own.
When I first had this vision in 1982, I thought that if evolution could liberate us from our cultural conditioning, we could intelligently live in the Age of Light for a few more generations, until the 23rd century, at least. However, since meeting Guy McPherson, co-author of Extinction Dialogs: How to Live with Death in Mind, in 2017, I have realized that I have been far too optimistic. Reducing the aerosol masking of industrial pollution would further accelerate the exponential rate of climate heating, which is likely to destroy the habitat we rely on to grow our food within a decade or three.
But how we could help Generation Alpha and their parents and teachers at these end times we live in is the most critical question that I have been wrestling with since my twin granddaughters were born in 2010.
Fairly obviously, when humankind becomes extinct, banks and stock markets will also disappear. So, money will no longer act as a delusional immortality symbol. Under these circumstances, as we are all interconnected, the only intelligent and caring way forward for humanity is to share our skills and resources for the benefit of us all, knowing that there is no death in Ultimate Reality.
We can be much inspired to such Self-realization by those spiritual teachers who are engaged in helping their followers to transcend categories, classes, and concepts by answering the question Who am I? For, in the beautiful, wise words of the Sufi poet Rumi, “Love is the sea of not-being and there intellect drowns.”

The Chinese were the first to use metallic artefacts as abstract tokens of value, such as symbols of axes, spears, knives, swords, hoes, and spades, made out of copper, bronze, and iron, illustrated here. Today, representations of money – as commodities with value – have been taken to the utmost level of abstraction, as bits of data in computer systems, increasingly replacing traditional coins and notes displaying sovereigns’ heads, as symbols of power and authority.